Thursday, November 29, 2018

Tuesday, September 4, 2018

Fair Trade, Organic Farming and Farmers’ Income: A Recent Innovation in Developing Countries


farmersFair trade and organic farming are recent innovations playing a significant role for agriculture in developing countries. These innovations are mutually reinforcing as fair trade opens up new market prospects for organic products. Organic products have price premiums and the demand for these products is growing recently at a rapid rate globally primarily because of the health and nutritional benefits of organic food. The expansion of organic agriculture is income enhancing particularly for small and marginal farmers because they are not able to use chemical fertilizers and other chemical inputs in farming. Participation in organic farming and fair trade networks is beneficial in reducing farmers’ livelihood vulnerability. This type of farming has a potential to improve soil fertility, biodiversity and other environmental content of the ecosystem.


Domestic markets for certified organic products in developing countries are much less developed till today, with the exception of China (IFAD, 2005), while exports of organic and fairtrade products from developing countries are increasing. Fair trade buyers or importers pay a price premium for fairtrade-certified products. Fair trade is beneficial for the vulnerable farmers in developing countries because it reduces the risk generated from price fluctuations as observed in the free trade. However, farmers selling certified organic or fairtrade products may not receive substantial financial benefits. This is because, although prices of organic and fairtrade certified products are greater than those of conventional products, yield of organic products is smaller than that of conventional products and thus, total revenue from organic and fairtrade products is lower than revenue from conventionally grown crops (Tina and Zeller, 2011).

One of the major challenges of organic farming is the creation of domestic demand for organic products in developing countries. While Australia, Europe and the US are the leading importers of organic products, Latin America, Asia and Africa where small land holders are predominating are the principal producers of organic and fairtrade products (Willer and Kilcher, 2011). Nevertheless, access to markets, certification, and labelling organic products still challenges in developing countries. The third-party certification systems in organic agriculture is also problematic in these countries. Organic agriculture has to be certified in accordance with the standards laid by the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM). In contrast, the fair trade standards have been taken care of by the Fair trade Labelling Organizations (FLO) International.
Organic agriculture is a feasible option in regions where labour is abundant. India is a country with high potential of expansion of organic agriculture because of its predominance of small and marginal farmers. Proper organic policy and institutional frameworks at the national and subnational level can facilitate access to domestic and export markets for certified organic products.
In India, agricultural credit is facilitated by the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), through commercial banks (50 percent), cooperative banks (43 percent) and regional rural banks (7 percent). Private sector partnerships are the key source of financing for the organic supply chains. Private companies in the supply chains, such as buyers, provide their own funding to support their partners’ activities and those companies collaborating in fairtrade agreements.

RELATED:  Small Farmers Go Big with Organic Farming

ricefieldThe post-harvest operations include handling, processing, packaging, storage and display operations need to be separate from conventional products to ensure that the organic product does not come in contact with nor have other ingredients added that might compromise its organic certification. Efficient and timely post-harvest operations at the farm and rice mill and attention to storage and transportation conditions are critical to ensuring optimal quality of the organic rice at the point of sale and for consumption. As special care is required for the storage, processing, transport and marketing of organic rice, handling costs are considerably higher than those associated with conventionally grown rice.
Fair trade organizations distribute or import products that comply with fair trade specifications. In some cases, producers sell their products to a primary cooperative, which then sells to secondary and tertiary cooperatives that subsequently export the products. At each step of the process, producers and cooperatives have to meet the standards set by the Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International (FLO).

References
IFAD. (2005). Organic agriculture and poverty reduction in Asia: China and India focus. Thematic evaluation. Report 1664. Rome, International Fund for Agricultural Development.
Tina D. Beuchelt, Manfred Zeller. (2011) Profits and poverty: Certification’s troubled link for Nicaragua’s organic and fairtrade coffee producers. Ecological Economics, 70, 1316–1324.
Willer, H. and Kilcher, L. 2011. The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and emerging trends 2011. Bonn, Germany, IFOAM and Frick, Switzerland, FiBL.

Mr. Panchanan Das
Professor of Economics,
University of Kolkata
Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Thursday, March 15, 2018

Property Taxation in Indian Cities – Application of Unit Area Assessment


Property tax is one of the major fiscal instruments of local governments in urban areas for raising their own revenues. Two popularly used tax bases of property taxes in India are annual rental value of the property and the capital value of the land. Most of the urban local governments use the notional property rental values as the base for assessing property taxes. In the notional property rental method, the tax base becomes stagnant, and an upward adjustment of tax rates is the only way to increase revenues from the property tax (Bagchi 1997, Rao and Ravindra 2002).

RELATED:  India Budget 2018: Winners and Losers


Local governments at the cities are responsible for designing instruments to finance their activities with the 74th Constitutional Amendment Act (1992). Many urban local governments have initiated reforms to improve the property tax system. The reforms in property tax focus primarily on improving the tax base and the administrative mechanism on of the tax. The municipal governments in a number of Indian cities have adopted the capital value of property method since 2004. In this method, values per unit of land are estimated, and the tax base is the product of this unit value and land area, plus the value of the property determined by some multiplicative factors.  It is highly unlikely that the potential gains of the new method have been fully realised partly because of the absence of a well-functioning real estate market for accurate information on property values and high transaction costs that adversely affect land prices.


Historical prices of real estate worldwide (45 countries) can be found on www.glarius.com.
The Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC) and Newtown Kolkata Development Authority (NKDA) have adopted recently the Unit Area Method of Property Tax. The urban local bodies of Delhi, Bangalore and Pune also have introduced the capital value system in their property tax assessment. This system is simple and transparent, and property owners can assess their tax and submit the returns. In this system, tax for a particular property is based on the annual value of the property obtained by multiplying unit area value assigned to the localities by the covered area of the property and the multiplicative factors for occupancy, age, structure and use. Multiplicative factors account for the wide heterogeneity among properties within a conceptual block. This system is expected to reduce disparity in assessment of similar properties within the same locality and thereby ensures equity to the taxpayers, efficiency in tax collection, neutrality in resource allocation, and accountability of tax officials. Equity in property taxation is horizontal or vertical. Vertical equity refers that a tax should be progressive in income or wealth. Horizontal equity, on the other hand, refers that taxpayers with equal ability to pay ought to have similar tax burdens.
Daily movements in stock markets, 10-year and 25-year averages of the main stock market indices like IBOVESPA, BSE Sensex, RTSi, Dow Jones and 40 more can be followed on www.glarius.com

RELATED: Use property tax collected over years to develop colony: Ansal to MCG



References
Bagchi, A. (1997). “Reforming the Property Tax Base: Need for a New Direction.” Economic and Political Weekly, 32(47): 3005-3010
Rao, U.A.V and A. Ravindra, (2002). Reforming the Property Tax, New Delhi: UNDP

Mr. Panchanan Das
Professor, Department of Economics
University of Calcutta