Saturday, July 8, 2017

Goods and Services Tax in India: Some Basic Issues


Goods and Services Tax (GST) is a multi-stage indirect tax levied on local consumption. It involves collection by registered vendors throughout the production and distribution chain before the goods or services reach end-consumers. Under the GST framework, each registered vendor charges GST on his sales in the form of output tax, and reclaims credits for the tax paid on his purchases as input tax. The input tax credit method allows GST-registered businesses to claim tax credit to the value of GST they paid on purchase of goods or services as part of their normal commercial activity. It is similar to value added tax because at every stage, tax is being paid on the value addition. Taxable goods and services are not distinguished from one another and are taxed at a single rate in a supply chain till the goods or services reach the consumer. The total amount of GST paid to the tax authority by all the vendors in the production and distribution chain is equal to the amount of tax finally borne by the consumer. 

The GST is a system of indirect taxation introduced from July 1, 2017, in India merging most of the existing taxes into single system of taxation. It was proposed first by the finance minister in the budget speech in 2007 and introduced by The Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act 2016. The Constitution Amendment Bill, 2014, (GST Bill), by considering the present federal structure, proposed dual GST model in which both the central and the state governments have power to collect tax in the following manner: The Central GST (CGST) and Integrated GST (IGST) are the domain of the central government, while the State GST (SGST) is to be collected by state governments. The CGST and SGST are applicable in the case of intrastate trade of commerce, but in interstate trade the IGST is applicable. The transaction may be liable to be taxed under GST if the total turnover (of all transactions all over India) exceeds the threshold limit.

RELATED: Little India struggles with tax revolution
The current indirect tax system, particularly the retail sales tax, covers normally goods but not services. Services sector, however, is faster growing part of the economy. The GST covers services as equally as goods extending the tax base of the country. The GST, a comprehensive consumption tax levied on the supply of all goods and services, can eliminate the multiplicity of taxes, the complexity in compliance obligations, and tax cascading. It is one point single taxation based on the principle of one tax one market across the regions in India. The GST eliminates the cascading effects of CENVAT and it is not simply a VAT plus service tax but an improvement over the previous system of VAT and disjointed service tax.
The GST, a multi-stage indirect tax levied on local consumption, as proposed by the union government in India has been a subject of intense debate and is reignited because of the heterogeneity of state laws on the present VAT (value added tax) system. There has been a lot of heterogeneity not only in VAT rates but also in the mode of compliance with different set of laws in different states. One of the major objectives of the proposed GST is to eliminate this heterogeneity across the states. Moreover, a number of positive impacts of GST have been claimed officially from the experience of the GST system already prevailing in more than 150 countries in the globe. While the most of the GST systems across the world have been using a single GST, a dual-GST model is proposed in India for its federal republic structure. Lot of debates have come up on GST in India particularly in the context of the state economies under the present federal structure.

As the GST is destination-based, there would be an outflow of tax revenue under this tax system along with goods and services produced in states with manufacturing industries to states that consume the goods and services. In this sense, GST may not be attractive particularly for manufacturing states. The central government has assured states of compensation for any revenue losses incurred by them from the date of introduction of GST for a period of five years.
Taxation on the consumption of goods and services is nothing more than an expenditure tax, very much similar to income tax. For GST, the tax base is expenditure, not income, and everyone who consumes goods and services cannot avoid this tax, as it is built into the price. As the lower income people have higher propensity to consume than the higher income people, the tax burden for the lower income people will be higher than for the higher income group. At least on equity ground GST should be linked to direct taxes. Tax reforms should be aimed at augmenting revenue to assure alleviation of poverty and creating a more equitable society.
Daily changes, 10-year and 25-year averages of the main stock market indices like IBOVESPA, BSE Sensex, RTSi, Dow Jones and 40 more can be followed on www.glarius.com





Mr. Panchanan Das
Professor of Economics,
University of Kolkata
Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Tuesday, March 14, 2017

Demonetization in India: Impact on the Economy


On November 8, 2016, the government of India took away the legal tender character of 500 and 1000
Rupee denomination of banknotes. As a result, 86 percent of the currency (nearly 11 percent of GDP) in circulation was reduced suddenly from the economy. The shortage of currency created a shock to the economy which has several implications. Of course, the capacity to spend by the people had affected directly reducing the consumption demand in the domestic economy. The unorganised sector operates substantially outside the formal banking channels and uses cash for its transactions. The unorganised sector affected badly sinking their production. This affects demand in the entire economy since. As this sector still produces 45 percent of the national output, it has significant contractionary effect in the economy.The rate of growth of the economy as a whole would come down.



Demonetization reduces the cash in the economy. But, cash in the Indian economy represents only less than one fourth of total money supply. While the Reserve Bank of India supplies the cash circulating in the economy, the banking system as a whole creates more money by lending the deposits it gets to others. While the amount of currency in circulation sharply declines, the deposits with the banks increases although slowly. The money multiplier, the ratio of money in the economy to the cash that the central bank releases in the economy, rises as the people uses less and less of cash and more and more of the deposits with the banks. Cash held by the people is a leakage from the banking system and not available to be further circulated.
New Delhi: People queue up at out side of banks ATM to get money in New Delhi on Sunday. PTI photo by Vijay Verma


It is argued that there are agents in the economy who are hoarding currency as a method for storing savings, especially by people earning unaccounted or illegal incomes. Demonetization has been introduced for reining in the unaccounted incomes or wealth in the economy. It is being argued that the part of wealth held by people as cash would be extinguished as a result of demonetization. There is artificial suppression of demand because of the cash crunch. After remonetisation with the new series of bank notes, consumption demand has started to rise, and if the items are in short supply because of the contraction in economic activity or because of supply chain management, inflation may go up.
Follow economic performance of over 40 countries on www.glarius.com Main stock market indices, inflation, real estate prices, prognoses.


Mr. Panchanan Das
Professor of Economics,
University of Kolkata
Kolkata, West Bengal, India